Eugen Cakolli from KDI has reacted to the debate taking place in the country regarding vote manipulations that have taken place within political parties.
Cakolli, through a post on his profile, said that framing the debate in the form of who stole more or less is an open defense of theft.
"Don't think that, after all this "social development", we are reaching the point where party militants and hybrids are relativizing vote manipulation by trying to shift the debate to "who manipulated the most", and not to the essential question: was there manipulation or not."
In fact, for some, the length of the columns in the graphs is more important than the facts, names, and concrete numbers. Their logic is of the type "yes, we have misused, but others have even more".
"Any attempt to turn electoral crime into a comparative party competition is either ignorance or open defense of theft. In both cases, it is part of the problem. Because responsibility must be given in full, for each vote - and everyone who manipulated should end up in prison, without exception," Cakolli wrote.
